2009 Lancia Ypsilon vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Lancia Ypsilon. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lancia Ypsilon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lancia Ypsilon weights approximately 246 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lancia Ypsilon | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Lancia | Zastava |
| Model | Ypsilon | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1240 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2160 mm |
