2009 Land Rover Defender vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire

To start off, 2009 Land Rover Defender is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 888 kg more than 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire.

Because 2009 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Land Rover Defender 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
Make Land Rover Oldsmobile
Model Defender Starfire
Year Released 2009 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2402 cc 6965 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 2708 kg 1820 kg
Vehicle Length 3900 mm 5370 mm
Vehicle Height 1930 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 3130 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]