2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith would be higher. At 4,257 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (231 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith. (124 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1951 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith | |
Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
Model | LR2 | Silver Wraith |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3192 cc | 4257 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 81 L |