2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Land Rover | Oldsmobile |
| Model | LR2 | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3192 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
