2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1967 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1967 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 600.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Seat 600. (48 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1967 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Seat |
| Model | LR2 | 600 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3192 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 234 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1390 mm |
