2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1968 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 TVR Tuscan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 TVR Tuscan would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 TVR Tuscan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (231 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1968 TVR Tuscan. (229 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1968 TVR Tuscan.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 TVR Tuscan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1968 TVR Tuscan has manual transmission. 1968 TVR Tuscan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1968 TVR Tuscan | |
| Make | Land Rover | TVR |
| Model | LR2 | Tuscan |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3192 cc | 4727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |
