2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1970 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,534 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1970 Lincoln Continental. (209 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1970 Lincoln Continental.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Lincoln Continental (464 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Land Rover LR2. (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1970 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Land Rover LR2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1970 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Land Rover | Lincoln |
Model | LR2 | Continental |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3192 cc | 7534 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 234 Nm | 464 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2030 mm |