2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1974 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Holden Belmont (239 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2009 Land Rover LR2. (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2009 Land Rover LR2.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Holden Belmont (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Land Rover LR2. (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1974 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Land Rover LR2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1974 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Land Rover | Holden |
Model | LR2 | Belmont |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3192 cc | 5042 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 234 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1890 mm |