2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1974 TVR M
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 TVR M would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 TVR M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1974 TVR M has manual transmission. 1974 TVR M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1974 TVR M | |
| Make | Land Rover | TVR |
| Model | LR2 | M |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3192 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
