2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1977 Simca 1309
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Simca 1309. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Simca 1309 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1977 Simca 1309. (87 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1977 Simca 1309.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Simca 1309. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Simca 1309. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Simca 1309.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1977 Simca 1309 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Simca |
| Model | LR2 | 1309 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3192 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 234 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 199 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
