2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1982 Austin Ambassador
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (91 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Ambassador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (155 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1982 Austin Ambassador | |
| Make | Land Rover | Austin |
| Model | LR2 | Ambassador |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3192 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 234 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
