2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover LR2 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Land Rover | Oldsmobile |
Model | LR2 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3192 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1840 mm |