2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 2003 Mercury Marauder

To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercury Marauder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercury Marauder would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercury Marauder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercury Marauder (296 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2009 Land Rover LR2. (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercury Marauder should accelerate faster than 2009 Land Rover LR2.

Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercury Marauder. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercury Marauder (420 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Land Rover LR2. (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Mercury Marauder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Land Rover LR2.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Land Rover LR2 2003 Mercury Marauder
Make Land Rover Mercury
Model LR2 Marauder
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3192 cc 4606 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 227 HP 296 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 234 Nm 420 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 10.1:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1990 mm