2009 Land Rover LR2 vs. 2004 Renault Megane

To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2004 Renault Megane. (133 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Megane.

Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Megane. (185 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Land Rover LR2 2004 Renault Megane
Make Land Rover Renault
Model LR2 Megane
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type SUV Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3192 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 227 HP 133 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 234 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 82.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 96 mm 93 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 11.5:1
Top Speed 199 km/hour 205 km/hour
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1780 mm