2009 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Singer Vogue III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover LR3 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
Make | Land Rover | Singer |
Model | LR3 | Vogue III |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4394 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Top Speed | 199 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |