2009 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1965 Renault 10
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 10 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1965 Renault 10. (42 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 10.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Renault 10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Renault 10. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Renault 10.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover LR3 | 1965 Renault 10 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Renault |
| Model | LR3 | 10 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4394 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 42 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 316 Nm | 77 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
