2009 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1966 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 1966 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover LR3 | 1966 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Land Rover | ZAZ |
| Model | LR3 | 966 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4394 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 316 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
