2009 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover LR3 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | LR3 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4394 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 316 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |