2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 422 kg more than 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2572 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 107 L |