2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 579 kg more than 1986 Rover 825.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Rover 825. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport has automatic transmission and 1986 Rover 825 has manual transmission. 1986 Rover 825 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1986 Rover 825 | |
Make | Land Rover | Rover |
Model | Range Rover Sport | 825 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 22.2 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 68 L |