2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada weights approximately 32 kg more than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2004 Oldsmobile Bravada | |
Make | Land Rover | Oldsmobile |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Bravada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2087 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 22.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 83 L |