2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 697 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan Hardbody has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1358 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 22.2 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 90 L |