2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2006 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota RAV4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota RAV4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 760 kg more than 2006 Toyota RAV4.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2006 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | Range Rover Sport | RAV4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 22.2 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 57 L |