2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2012 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2012 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 481 kg more than 2012 Ford Transit Connect.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Transit Connect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2012 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 58 L |