2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 127 kg more than 2013 Volvo X670.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | X670 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1928 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2815 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
