2009 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,630 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (268 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1061 kg more than 1953 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Talbot Baby. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Land Rover | Talbot |
Model | Range Rover | Baby |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 3630 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3130 mm |