2009 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1341 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Range Rover | Celeste |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2286 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2350 mm |