2009 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2000 Citroen C3
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (301 HP) has 229 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1400 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover | 2000 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Land Rover | Citroen |
Model | Range Rover | C3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4394 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2486 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 24.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 45 L |