2009 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2003 Studebaker Avanti
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Studebaker Avanti. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Studebaker Avanti would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Studebaker Avanti is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Studebaker Avanti. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2003 Studebaker Avanti has manual transmission. 2003 Studebaker Avanti will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | 2003 Studebaker Avanti | |
| Make | Land Rover | Studebaker |
| Model | Range Rover | Avanti |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3630 cc | 5665 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
