2009 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (268 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 797 kg more than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (641 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | Range Rover | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3630 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 641 Nm | 382 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 87 L |