2009 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 54 kg more than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Land Rover | Fisker |
Model | Range Rover | Karma |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2486 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 36 L |