2009 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (400 HP) has 332 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2012 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2012 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Pixo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |