2009 Lexus GX vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z
To start off, both 2009 Lexus GX and 2009 Nissan 370Z were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lexus GX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 370Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Lexus GX. (263 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 2009 Lexus GX.
Because 2009 Lexus GX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan 370Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lexus GX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus GX (438 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan 370Z. (270 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2009 Lexus GX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan 370Z. 2009 Lexus GX has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan 370Z has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan 370Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Lexus GX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lexus GX | 2009 Nissan 370Z | |
Make | Lexus | Nissan |
Model | GX | 370Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4670 cc | 3697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 438 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.2 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |