2009 Lexus LS vs. 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 2009 Lexus LS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lexus LS (358 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lexus LS weights approximately 390 kg more than 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lexus LS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lexus LS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus LS (466 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star. (215 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2009 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star. 2009 Lexus LS has automatic transmission and 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star has manual transmission. 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Lexus LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lexus LS | 2007 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
Make | Lexus | Mitsubishi |
Model | LS | Space Star |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1869 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 358 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 466 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.8:1 | 19.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 55 L |