2009 Lexus LS vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Lexus LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Lexus LS would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2009 Lexus LS. (357 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 2009 Lexus LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lexus LS weights approximately 80 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Virage.
Because 2009 Lexus LS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Aston Martin Virage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lexus LS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (569 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lexus LS. (466 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lexus LS.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lexus LS | 2013 Aston Martin Virage | |
Make | Lexus | Aston Martin |
Model | LS | Virage |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 357 HP | 490 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 466 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1865 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4703 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2061 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1282 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 78 L |