2009 Lexus RX vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Lexus RX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,311 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lexus RX (268 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lexus RX weights approximately 950 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lexus RX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus RX (840 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 735 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2009 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lexus RX | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lexus | Renault |
| Model | RX | Clio |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3311 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 840 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 17.9:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.6 seconds | 15.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |
