2009 Lincoln MKS vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lincoln MKS | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
Model | MKS | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |