2009 Lincoln MKZ vs. 2005 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln MKZ (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2005 Mazda MPV. (200 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKZ should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda MPV.
Because 2009 Lincoln MKZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln MKZ (338 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm). This means 2009 Lincoln MKZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lincoln MKZ | 2005 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
Model | MKZ | MPV |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 75 L |