2009 Lotus Elise vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2009 Lotus Elise is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Elise (218 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. (197 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 190 kg more than 2009 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lotus Elise | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Lotus | Sunbeam |
| Model | Elise | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 4738 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 218 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 27 L |
