2009 Lotus Evora vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Lotus Evora is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2009 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Evora (342 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lotus Evora | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Evora | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 252 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |