2009 Lotus Exige vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2009 Lotus Exige is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Exige (257 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Exige (236 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lotus Exige | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Lotus | Reliant |
Model | Exige | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 236 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 38 L |