2009 Lotus Exige vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 2009 Lotus Exige is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Exige (240 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 264. (149 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 264.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Exige (231 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 264. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 264.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lotus Exige | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | Exige | 264 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |