2009 Maserati Quattroporte vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Maserati Quattroporte is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Maserati Quattroporte (434 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 354 kg more than 2009 Maserati Quattroporte.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Maserati Quattroporte. (490 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Maserati Quattroporte.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Maserati Quattroporte | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Maserati | Nissan |
Model | Quattroporte | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4690 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 434 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 490 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 2344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 106 L |