2009 Maybach 57 vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Maybach 57 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Maybach 57 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Maybach 57 (544 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (240 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Maybach 57 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Maybach 57 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Maybach 57 (900 Nm) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (427 Nm). This means 2009 Maybach 57 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Maybach 57 | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Maybach | Toyota |
| Model | 57 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5513 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 544 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 900 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2735 kg | 2300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3400 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 99 L |
