2009 Mazda 2 vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 2 | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 2 | Valiant |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |