2009 Mazda 2 vs. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 810 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2.
Because 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 2 | 1964 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 2 | Bonneville |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 6375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3130 mm |