2009 Mazda 2 vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 2 | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 2 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |