2009 Mazda 2 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 2 weights approximately 381 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 2 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | 2 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2160 mm |
