2009 Mazda 2 vs. 1983 Triumph Acclaim

To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Triumph Acclaim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Triumph Acclaim would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Triumph Acclaim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Triumph Acclaim (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Triumph Acclaim should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 2 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1983 Triumph Acclaim.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Triumph Acclaim (245 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Triumph Acclaim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 2 1983 Triumph Acclaim
Make Mazda Triumph
Model 2 Acclaim
Year Released 2009 1983
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 2213 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 99 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1155 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 3930 mm 4100 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1610 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2330 mm