2009 Mazda 2 vs. 1992 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 140 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (137 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda 2 1992 Nissan Pulsar
Make Mazda Nissan
Model 2 Pulsar
Year Released 2009 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1498 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 102 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 137 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 960 kg 1100 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 4150 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2440 mm